ChicagoDiscus.com     Golden State Discus

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

  1. #1
    Registered Member Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    953

    Default disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    I built a DIY purigen reactor today with a cheap 10" filter canister.
    Works exactly like any commercial reactor but...
    I was hoping it would hold more media ...it doesn't.
    I was hoping it would have a larger water flow rate...it doesn't.

    So although cheaper, cost about $20 to build, not counting the pump, but I want better performance.
    I may try one with the 10" big clear 4.5" dia canister
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Registered Member two utes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Victoria Australia
    Posts
    1,847
    Real Name
    Joe Zammit

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neptune View Post
    I built a DIY purigen reactor today with a cheap 10" filter canister.
    Works exactly like any commercial reactor but...
    I was hoping it would hold more media ...it doesn't.
    I was hoping it would have a larger water flow rate...it doesn't.

    So although cheaper, cost about $20 to build, not counting the pump, but I want better performance.
    I may try one with the 10" big clear 4.5" dia canister
    Don't know if it would work, but have you though about running another 10'' canister filter parallel to it? Providing your pump is strong enough the water should flow through. Maybe run different media in the second unit....Just a thought
    We're here for a good time...not a long time

  3. #3
    Registered Member Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    953

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Quote Originally Posted by two utes View Post
    Don't know if it would work, but have you though about running another 10'' canister filter parallel to it? Providing your pump is strong enough the water should flow through. Maybe run different media in the second unit....Just a thought
    I was thinking of trying that, but I figured the flow rate would be too difficult to control between the two. I would think the first one would always have a faster rate than the second.

    I'm going to try the larger 4.5" diameter one. Might be the ticket.

    But I did learn one thing....tough to beat the phosban 150 for just a simple, quick down and dirty reactor.

  4. #4
    Registered Member SomeFin's Fishy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Palatine, IL
    Posts
    79
    Real Name
    Mark

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neptune View Post
    I was hoping it would have a larger water flow rate...it doesn't.
    Keep in mind that any "reactor" used for Purigen will have a slower flow rate. In order to work correctly, the Purigen should be suspended in the water column. Too fast a flow rate and the media will be become packed around the out-flow and you won't get the same results. If you just want to use Purigen along with your regular filtration system, then you can just put it in a media bag as you would any other media, but it's effectiveness will probably be reduced.

  5. #5
    Registered Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    central Illinois
    Posts
    1,424

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    you will need very little flow through to work or its going to fail. Mine ran on less than 30gph FYI you cannot put full force pump you will need to restrict it somehow. I use a aquarium Systems 404 pump turned way down.

  6. #6
    Registered Member Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    953

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Yep aware of all the issues with Purigen. The real design constraint is that Purigen is just slightly more dense than water. So as others have mentioned, ANY high flow rate is going to kick it out. But flow rate can be adjusted with a valve OR a larger container.
    (Bernoulli?)

    I don't consider the bags much of an alternative. Flow rates through the bags won't be as good as fluidized bed, it is much more expensive per bag. I want to achieve the highest flow rate I can through the largest amount of Purigen I can.
    I'm after the Holy Grail of Purigen reactors!!

    It might be the wider canister or the taller canister.
    I really like the idea of the way the one is constructed in the Wow Factor stickie, but the tall canister is not practical in a cabinet. The nice thing about that design is it incorporates a pleated filter into the outflow tube!
    Last edited by Neptune; 12-15-2016 at 01:28 PM.

  7. #7
    Registered Member Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    953

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    ok WHY is that bigger canister so outrageously expensive in the clear??? aRRRGGhhhh

  8. #8
    Registered Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    424

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    I've been looking into this setup too. Currently, I'm using an Aquatop MR20, which does a good job. But man is it a pain to get the purigen out to recharge it and fill it back up. I was thinking of going with an empty deionizer cartridge filter and filling that up with purigen.

  9. #9
    Registered Member Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    953

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    That will work OK,
    But a couple things to think about.
    You will have to put something into the DI cartridge so the Purigen doesn't exit the cartridge.
    You won't get a lot in there. You don't want to pack it like DI resin.

    Other than that it will work.

  10. #10
    Registered Member CraigJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    194

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Hi Neptune,

    I've had good luck using the Omni OB5 filter which can easily hold a liter of Purigen, if needed. If I wanted more room on the inside, I could just use 1/2" PVC instead of 3/4". Not bad for a $12 filter housing, I think.

    As has been mentioned, a slow flow rate is preferred.


  11. #11
    Registered Member Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    953

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Do you happen to know the diameter of the housing? Is it bigger than a standard RO 10" canister?
    Do you reverse the flow? That is water goes in the "out" port?

  12. #12
    Registered Member CraigJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    194

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    I believe this filter is a standard 10" canister as most take similar cartridges. It is a little over 5" wide at the top. Yes, the flow is reversed so the flow comes out of the center (bottom) of the filter canister.

    I have followed Afriend's directions for some of my build. If you want more internal room in your current canister, wouldn't 1/2" pvc solve this?

  13. #13
    Registered Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    424

    Default Re: disappointed in my DIY purigen reactor.

    Liking the reactor, Craig. I can't believe Seachem hasn't either made their own or paired up with someone to produce a Purigen reactor. It's all about the dollar, and they could make a bunch if they did.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Cafepress