JeffreyRichard
05-19-2005, 03:16 PM
This is coming from a response to my post regarding raising daphnia ... I heard it quite a bit in the past (particularly around Blackworms) ... looking for thoughts/ideas/debate, etc ...
Live food (general) are risky because they (can) carry parasites ...
Now, I understand that Tubifex worms can be risky, but isn't it because the worms themselves come from polluted sources? If so, isn't it more accurate to say these foods are TOXIC to fish, as opposed to carriers of parasites?
OK, how about daphnia ... is it inherently dangerous to feed live daphnia to discus if the daphnia are grown outdoors? I'm not seeing the logic with this ... a carrier of parasites must be exposed to an infected source to become infected themselves. If I grow daphia outside in tubs/barrels, I not seeing where the parasites come from to infect the source. I suppose if a bird were an intermediate carrier of something like tapeworm, and then deficate in the tub/barrel, there is a possible source. But does parasites such as hexamita, spirolnuclosis, etc originate with daphnia and then get passed on thru the food chain? I'm hoping Al or someone with a scientific background can answer this ...
My FEELING (not a factual statement ... please note) is that the fear of live food started and has propogated through the general paranoia of losing fish ... not wanting to chance the "unknown" ... I think the bigger risk is that live food may carry toxins from the environment they come from ... which is quite a bit different from carrying parasites even though the end result may still result in death ...
Fish eat live food in nature ... why not feed them what is natural?
Live food (general) are risky because they (can) carry parasites ...
Now, I understand that Tubifex worms can be risky, but isn't it because the worms themselves come from polluted sources? If so, isn't it more accurate to say these foods are TOXIC to fish, as opposed to carriers of parasites?
OK, how about daphnia ... is it inherently dangerous to feed live daphnia to discus if the daphnia are grown outdoors? I'm not seeing the logic with this ... a carrier of parasites must be exposed to an infected source to become infected themselves. If I grow daphia outside in tubs/barrels, I not seeing where the parasites come from to infect the source. I suppose if a bird were an intermediate carrier of something like tapeworm, and then deficate in the tub/barrel, there is a possible source. But does parasites such as hexamita, spirolnuclosis, etc originate with daphnia and then get passed on thru the food chain? I'm hoping Al or someone with a scientific background can answer this ...
My FEELING (not a factual statement ... please note) is that the fear of live food started and has propogated through the general paranoia of losing fish ... not wanting to chance the "unknown" ... I think the bigger risk is that live food may carry toxins from the environment they come from ... which is quite a bit different from carrying parasites even though the end result may still result in death ...
Fish eat live food in nature ... why not feed them what is natural?