markwill
07-13-2005, 11:25 AM
My discus appear to be doing well (bought them last Friday). In setting up my tank earlier, I had decided to shoot for a pH of 6.5 or so and use a ph "targeting" powder. That worked a treat - pH was right around that mark.
However, in reading these forums (yes, Carol, I've been reading like crazy :-)) I am coming to the conclusion that I MAY go with an "untampered" pH for my tank (essentially, accept tap water pH). I am trying to balance my primary objective of happy, healthy discus in a show tank (living room) environment with a relatively low maintenence schedule. To be quite clear, I'll do whatever it takes to achieve that goal - but if there is a way to reduce labor I'll take it :-) More importantly. I reduce the risk of pH spikes or dips, a considerable benefit when I go on vacation and have someone do water changes.
So, here I am around 6.6 or in the tank, thanks to the pH treatment. I need to check again but if I recall my tap water is around 7.4 or so. My thinking is that if I can slowly get the pH in the tank back to that level then I reduce my need to use chemicals (which I consider "not good" if they can be avoided) and, as a secondary benefit, save money too! So, to my questions...
If I go this route, over what period of time should I move from my current pH to that of my tap water?
Would just untreated (no pH conditioner) water changes do the job or would I need to use a pH conditioner that moves me back up? Frankly, I have been doing untreated water changes with - to date - the occasional use of 6.5 conditioner and I have been surprised how "stable" the lower pH has been, given that I have needed to use little additional conditioner. I'm tempted to just stop using the conditioner but I'm not sure if that would move the pH upwards in "jolts".
I have read that ammonia concerns are greatly reduced (removed?) with a pH of 6.6. Presumably, that becomes relevant again at 7.4 or so. Is this correct?
Am I also correct in saying that the bacteria in my filtr are pretty much non-existent at 6.6 - but it's less important due to the previous bulletpoint?
My BIG concern relates to bacteria and what happens in a power cut. A couple of years ago we had three power cuts in the winter (one of which run to 2 days). If I lose power and I am requiring bacteria to be active because my pH is at 7.4, what are the implications of a power cut and how long would it take for the bacteria to die? My understanding is that I am less reliant on active bacteria in the filter with low pH. Is this true?
Although very much a secondary consideration (after simply seeing beautiful discus swimming around!), I would one day love to see a pair breed. Would a higher pH reduce the likelihood of this?
Quite honestly, the fact that discus can be happy at pH above 7.0 was news to me - I guess I fell for all that stereotypical "discus are difficult and everything has to be a specific way" stuff!!! So, the chance to limit the likelihood of pH spikes by using aged tap water (treated with Prime) without any pH treatments is very attractive to me. But I'd like to understand all aspects of this before settling on one approach or another.
Thanks in advance fo any thoughts on this.
Mark
However, in reading these forums (yes, Carol, I've been reading like crazy :-)) I am coming to the conclusion that I MAY go with an "untampered" pH for my tank (essentially, accept tap water pH). I am trying to balance my primary objective of happy, healthy discus in a show tank (living room) environment with a relatively low maintenence schedule. To be quite clear, I'll do whatever it takes to achieve that goal - but if there is a way to reduce labor I'll take it :-) More importantly. I reduce the risk of pH spikes or dips, a considerable benefit when I go on vacation and have someone do water changes.
So, here I am around 6.6 or in the tank, thanks to the pH treatment. I need to check again but if I recall my tap water is around 7.4 or so. My thinking is that if I can slowly get the pH in the tank back to that level then I reduce my need to use chemicals (which I consider "not good" if they can be avoided) and, as a secondary benefit, save money too! So, to my questions...
If I go this route, over what period of time should I move from my current pH to that of my tap water?
Would just untreated (no pH conditioner) water changes do the job or would I need to use a pH conditioner that moves me back up? Frankly, I have been doing untreated water changes with - to date - the occasional use of 6.5 conditioner and I have been surprised how "stable" the lower pH has been, given that I have needed to use little additional conditioner. I'm tempted to just stop using the conditioner but I'm not sure if that would move the pH upwards in "jolts".
I have read that ammonia concerns are greatly reduced (removed?) with a pH of 6.6. Presumably, that becomes relevant again at 7.4 or so. Is this correct?
Am I also correct in saying that the bacteria in my filtr are pretty much non-existent at 6.6 - but it's less important due to the previous bulletpoint?
My BIG concern relates to bacteria and what happens in a power cut. A couple of years ago we had three power cuts in the winter (one of which run to 2 days). If I lose power and I am requiring bacteria to be active because my pH is at 7.4, what are the implications of a power cut and how long would it take for the bacteria to die? My understanding is that I am less reliant on active bacteria in the filter with low pH. Is this true?
Although very much a secondary consideration (after simply seeing beautiful discus swimming around!), I would one day love to see a pair breed. Would a higher pH reduce the likelihood of this?
Quite honestly, the fact that discus can be happy at pH above 7.0 was news to me - I guess I fell for all that stereotypical "discus are difficult and everything has to be a specific way" stuff!!! So, the chance to limit the likelihood of pH spikes by using aged tap water (treated with Prime) without any pH treatments is very attractive to me. But I'd like to understand all aspects of this before settling on one approach or another.
Thanks in advance fo any thoughts on this.
Mark