PDA

View Full Version : Anti-Piracy bill backlash....



brewmaster15
01-17-2012, 10:04 AM
Seems theres alot of Backlash to an anti-piracy bill going on now.... If you haven't heard of this Bill, you may want to learn more about it as It could dramatically affect Internet usage and censorship in the USA....

Wikipedia and others are protesting...


Wikipedia to be blacked out over anti-piracy bill
Must Read?Yes 25
Email Story Print
By SARAH SKIDMORE, AP
3 hours ago

Wikipedia will black out the English language version of its website Wednesday to protest anti-piracy legislation under consideration in Congress, the foundation behind the popular community-based online encyclopedia said in a statement Monday night.

The website will go dark for 24 hours in an unprecedented move that brings added muscle to a growing base of critics of the legislation. Wikipedia is considered one of the Internet's most popular websites, with millions of visitors daily.

"If passed, this legislation will harm the free and open Internet and bring about new tools for censorship of international websites inside the United States," the Wikimedia foundation said.

The Stop Online Piracy Act in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Protect Intellectual Property Act under consideration in the Senate are designed to crack down on sales of pirated U.S. products overseas.

Supporters include the film and music industry, which often sees its products sold illegally. They say the legislation is needed to protect intellectual property and jobs.

Critics say the legislation could hurt the technology industry and infringe on free-speech rights. Among their concerns are provisions that would weaken cyber-security for companies and hinder domain access rights.

The most controversial provision is in the House bill, which would have enabled federal authorities to "blacklist" sites that are alleged to distribute pirated content. That would essentially cut off portions of the Internet to all U.S. users. But congressional leaders appear to be backing off this provision.

Tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Twitter, eBay, AOL and others have spoken out against the legislation and said it threatens the industry's livelihood. Several online communities such as Reddit, Boing Boing and others have announced plans to go dark in protest as well.

The Obama administration also raised concerns about the legislation over the weekend and said it will work with Congress on legislation to help battle piracy and counterfeiting while defending free expression, privacy, security and innovation in the Internet.

Wikipedia's decision to go dark brings the issue into a much brighter spotlight. A group of Wikipedia users have discussed for more than a month whether it should react to the legislation.

Over the past few days, a group of more than 1,800 volunteers who work on the site and other users considered several forms of online protest, including banner ads and a global blackout of the site, the foundation said. Ultimately, the group supported the decision to black out the English version of the site.

Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia who first announced the move on his Twitter account Monday, said the bills are a threat to the free, open, and secure web.

"The whole thing is just a poorly designed mess," Wales said in an email to The Associated Press.

Wikipedia is also requesting that readers contact members of Congress about the bill during the blackout.

"I am personally asking everyone who cares about freedom and openness on the Internet to contact their Senators and Representative," Wales said. "One of the things we have learned recently during the Arab spring events is that the Internet is a powerfully effective tool for the public to organize and have their voices heard."

Wikipedia will shut down access from midnight Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday night until midnight Wednesday.

This is the first time Wikipedia's English version has gone dark. Its Italian site came down once briefly in protest to an Internet censorship bill put forward by the Berlusconi government; the bill did not advance.

"Wikipedia is about being open," said Jay Walsh, spokesman for the Wikimedia foundation. "We are not about shutting down and protesting. It's not a muscle that is normally flexed."

___




Personally I have very strong reservations about this legislation... Its intent I understand....but it is too far reaching and very poorly crafted...it also benefits certain industries and business and hampers others.

The legislation and reaction explained... do a google search using ..... "anti-piracy bill meets web-freedom backlash"

-al

Darrell Ward
01-17-2012, 02:40 PM
Yeah, this is complicated. Industries are losing money, but at the same time, laws would never be able to stop piracy, and everyone else would suffer because of these laws.

Darrell Ward
01-19-2012, 01:24 AM
Looks like attempts to pass such a bill has failed, for now at least.

Orange Crush
01-19-2012, 01:29 AM
Looks like attempts to pass such a bill has failed, for now at least.

Yes, for now. However, if anyone wants to speak out against this bill so that the politicians hear you, this is one easy way to do it....
http://www.credoaction.com/campaign/internet_censorship/?rc=homepage

chrisb01
01-19-2012, 03:32 AM
I don't like the sound of it. I think it violates quite a few constitutional rights.

Our neighborhood passed a around a petition to our congressman and US senators, I signed all three.

Orange Crush
01-19-2012, 03:53 AM
I don't like the sound of it. I think it violates quite a few constitutional rights.

+1

typicalalex1
01-19-2012, 07:41 AM
It’s not just the US it affects, it’s the whole world.
They will soon have the power to prosecute people from all over the world if this law passes. The creator of TVShack here in the UK is facing prosecution, even though what he did is LEGAL in the UK.

According to this law, anyone that hosts illegal material will be prosecuted. People upload illegal stuff to youtube, this is shared on facebook, does this mean they will also be prosecuted.

Go to Youtube and search for 'Americas Biggest Scam'
It explains how messed up this law is.

brewmaster15
01-19-2012, 09:48 AM
My biggest fear in legislation like this is very few people actually understand what exactly is at stake. % wise theres very few people that have the technical background or interest in How the system currently works and that includes the politicians trying to legislate it. So they lean on "industry experts" many of which have much dollars at stake and are very very biased. This picture is bigger than many are aware.

The Internet is probably the single most import technological tool that every day people have access to in a largely unregulated form...Thats something that I don't think should change...and concentrating that kind of power in the hands of corp interests and politicians has far reaching consequences for data transfer, commerce, news,recreation, and just about everything else.. Any legislation that attempts to control this is something that needs to be looked at with great care and a level of insight that few have in government IMO.

Thats my take on it.

-al

scottthomas
01-19-2012, 05:57 PM
The Internet is probably the single most import technological tool that every day people have access to in a largely unregulated form...Thats something that I don't think should change...and concentrating that kind of power in the hands of corp interests and politicians has far reaching consequences for data transfer, commerce, news,recreation, and just about everything else.. Any legislation that attempts to control this is something that needs to be looked at with great care and a level of insight that few have in government IMO.

Thats my take on it.

-al

I agree with your well stated opinion.

Darrell Ward
01-19-2012, 08:30 PM
My biggest fear in legislation like this is very few people actually understand what exactly is at stake. % wise theres very few people that have the technical background or interest in How the system currently works and that includes the politicians trying to legislate it. So they lean on "industry experts" many of which have much dollars at stake and are very very biased. This picture is bigger than many are aware.

The Internet is probably the single most import technological tool that every day people have access to in a largely unregulated form...Thats something that I don't think should change...and concentrating that kind of power in the hands of corp interests and politicians has far reaching consequences for data transfer, commerce, news,recreation, and just about everything else.. Any legislation that attempts to control this is something that needs to be looked at with great care and a level of insight that few have in government IMO.

Thats my take on it.

-al

I'm at least thankful people rallied up against the big money lobbyist machine, and won! Do you suppose it had anything to do with it being an election year? LOL!

chrisb01
01-20-2012, 12:04 AM
It’s not just the US it affects, it’s the whole world.

True.


Do you suppose it had anything to do with it being an election year? LOL!

I bet if not yet, it might at least become an issue. But sure, we need to contact our reps. and let them know how we feel.

yim11
01-20-2012, 01:04 AM
I thought you took Simply dark to support the protest! Turns out it was just the server upgrade...

;)

brewmaster15
01-20-2012, 09:31 AM
I thought you took Simply dark to support the protest! Turns out it was just the server upgrade...

;) Lol!:D